[Leica] IMGS: Tests with MM and M246

[John McMaster]

Waste of time then, they are your cameras but what you show are not worthwhile tests ;-) 

john

________________________________________

As I have said before, I do not do controlled tests on tripods.  I do real
life tests the way I would use the cameras.  Tripod tests would be of no
use to me since I never use a tripod.  I hold the camera or prop it on the
nearest post.  It works for me, maybe not for others.

Tina

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:43 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:

> Not on a tripod so hard to compare (viewpoint changes), look for tonality
> differences at 320-1600asa as the 246 is better at +5000asa
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> PESO:
>
> I did some tests with the Noctilux and Summilux on the MM and M246.  I
> have a hard time telling the files apart.  I did notice that neither camera
> records the aperture correctly because all of the photos were either shot
> wide open or at F/8 and they were not recorded that way.  I also shot some
> with both cameras at ISO 6400 but that was not recorded either. The M246
> files are about half the size of the MM files.  These are the ones shot
> with the 50/1.4:
>
> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/162551679
>
> and hit next until the end.  These have absolutely nothing done to them
> except importing into LR as raw files and exporting to pBase as jpegs. I'll
> post the Noctilux ones later.
>
> Tina
>
> --
> Tina Manley
> www.tinamanley.com
> http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/
>
>