[Leica] Ideas on LUG Book 2016

[Steve Barbour]

me too Richard,

please go to it.


steve






> On Aug 28, 2016, at 1:18 PM, Jeff Moore <jbmmllug at jbm.org> wrote:
> 
> I'm glad to hear you haven't been driven away by last year's muttering
> minority, because I very much like the way the book you sequenced
> turned out.
> 
> Running contrary to the cost concerns I'm seeing...  the thing I've
> long wanted to see changed about the LUG book would be a move to the
> largest available paper format available from Blurb.  I think the
> images would have a better chance of shining printed larger, given the
> resolution limits of the printing process.  I don't expect it to
> happen, but I'll express the opinion this year as I have in previous
> years.
> 
> I'd be glad to send more than two images to give you more fodder to
> work with - and it'd be fine with me if you made the decision about
> which and how many to use, as long as I got my vanity minimum of two
> in.  My only concern with that is that if there are multiple on-page
> sizes being worked with, I'd prefer to be able to submit print-ready
> versions optimally scaled and sharpened for the precise size at which
> they'd be printed, just as (I assume) we must all be rendering while
> viewing proof images with the Blurb color profile taken into account.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information