[Leica] Ethics in photography

[Howard L Ritter Jr]

You seem to be gently remonstrating with me, Douglas. Did you miss that my “Yes” answer was to the question of whether Ken should have brought the error to the manager’s attention? Or were you answering Ken directly?

—howard ;-)


> On Aug 15, 2016, at 4:01 AM, Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp at gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> The way something like that works in Germany is that the member of staff on the checkout will have the difference docked from his or her paycheck (meagre as it will already be)
> after stocktaking/auditing is done. Can you live with that?
> 
> Cheers
> Douglas
> 
> 
> On 15.08.2016 06:33, Howard L Ritter Jr wrote:
>> Yes.
>> 
>> —howard
>> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 14, 2016, at 8:42 PM, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Here is today's question.  I am out of photo mailers, so I go to Staples to get some more.  I don't use them that often, so bought a pack of 11x14 for $7.99.  At checkout, the cashier says that will be 54 cents.  I say, that can't be right unless there is some really extreme sale.  The cashier says it is, that is how it scans.  Now the price is preposterous on its face, since I'm sure there is nothing in the store that sells for 54 cents.  So, the question is, should I have brought it to a manager's attention instead of buying out the remaining store stock?
>>> 
>>> Ken
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information