[Leica] M240 as Scanner

[Mark Rabiner]

As in the case of Tina right now its not so much the film we're not going to
shoot tomorrow its our body of film work  going back decades which would be
odd to ignore. Our photo lives did not start with our first digital cameras.
I do feel that hoping to deal with our film body of work of tens or
thousands of rolls of in in the same way as our current Terabytes of
captures is not practical as in a find in Lightroom or Bridge and we just
see everything we've ever shot. Do we know anyone who has pulled that off? .
I think  we must be selective and scan our main shots from those decades.
Keep it in the hundreds.


On 9/1/15 6:49 PM, "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote:

> May be scanners don't get mentioned much here because there are only a
> small number of us dinosaurs left who still shoot film or have film to scan
> and do it ourselves.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> 
>> On the other kind here on the lug other than a Hasselblad scanner non Nikon
>> scanners are simply ever mentioned. You'd think they didn't exist. You'd
>> think  that all scanners other than $40,000 dollar Hasselblad stopped
>> existing .
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/1/15 5:41 PM, "John McMaster" <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:
>> 
>>> I have not seen anyone say that they out-do the Nikon D8000/9000 or
>> Minolta
>>> Multi Scan-Pro of over a decade ago.....
>>> 
>>> john
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.fr at leica-users.org] On
>> Behalf Of
>>> Mark Rabiner
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 1 September 2015 11:37 p.m.
>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] M240 as Scanner
>>> 
>>> As other options go a quick glance at the B&H site which I'm sure
>> reflects a
>>> dozen other camera stores they are selling 26 different scanners from a
>>> bunch of different companies. I don't know why on the LUG we seem to be
>> in
>>> the mindset that the only viable scanners should be Nikons made several
>>> digital ages ago as if they are relic gems that no one will ever be able
>> to
>>> match or surpass. Is there any basis for that assumption we can spell
>> out?
>>> The Nikons were made in the infancy of digital technology. I'm sure the
>> can
>>> be beat with today's technology and know how.
>>> These are not toy companies folks.
>>> 
>>> Plustek OpticFilm 120 Film Scanner $1,849.99 (5300dpi)
>>> Braun MULTIMAG SlideScan 6000   $1,795.00 (5000 dpi)
>>> Pacific Image PF120 Pro Multi-Format Film Scanner (3200dpi)  Color Depth:
>>> 48-bit  $1,399.99
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 9/1/15 11:51 AM, "Tina Manley" <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> PESO:
>>>> 
>>>> My Nikon LS5000 is still broken and I haven't been able to get my
>>>> Imacon to work yet.  I have several thousand more negatives to scan.
>>>> This morning I tried using the Fuji X-Pro 1 and a macro lens with my
>>>> Beseler Slide Duplicator but I couldn't get the autofocus to work at
>>>> all.  So I got out my M240 and used it with the 100 Macro lens and the
>>>> EVF.  It's very difficult for me to focus manually but that seems to
>>>> be the only choice right now!
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.pbase.com/image/161174100
>>>> 
>>>> What do you think?  Worth working with or not?
>>>> 
>>>> Tina
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>> Photographer
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photographer
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/