[Leica] BIG new Leica
John McMaster
john at mcmaster.fr
Fri Oct 23 14:40:31 PDT 2015
It seems to be an odd TIF, opens in PhotoShop but not Mac preview
john
-----Original Message-----
Paul,
I can't get the link to work.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 10/23/2015 4:23 PM, Paul Roark wrote:
> Frank Dernie wrote:
>
>> ...
>> much easier to design an exceptional lens if size is not a constraint.
>> ...
>>
> Yes, everything is a whole set of compromises. I assume Leica and
> Zeiss will both continue to make optics that also cater to those who
> value compactness. The M line is Leica's current showcase of what it
> can do. It may be that the Loxia line for the Sony is representative
> of what Zeiss can do for that platform.
>
> Since wide angle optics are the main area of my concern regarding the
> Sony line, I was curious just how much of a penalty that platform will
> pay. To show this, I made a Tiff file with a cutout of the Leica v.
> Zeiss Loxia 21mm f/2.8 entries into this competition shown on
> different layers. The images are adjusted to equalize size and distance from the sensor/film.
> Some might find looking at the two similar optics interesting.
> Download the Tiff from
> http://www.paulroark.com/Loxia-v-Leica-21-f28.tif
>
> As to relative sharpness, all we have are MTF curves that are not
> necessarily comparable. If they are to be believed, the Zeiss wins by
> a hair. My experience is that Leica is more conservative in these, and in
> the real world Leica might well win by a hair. The main and more
> objective measure of performance that could be important is that,
> consistent with the performances we see in other wide angle lenses,
> the more retrofocus optic has less vignetting. Zeiss is claiming light
> falloff at f/2.8 that is equal to the Leica at f/8.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>
>
More information about the LUG
mailing list