[Leica] Leica lenses on other cameras

Paul Roark roark.paul at gmail.com
Thu Oct 8 10:56:49 PDT 2015


I have not found a fast 24mm that works.  The WATE is too slow and really
needs to be stopped down a bit for good performance (like f/8).  The Batis
25mm f/2 appears to be to have an amazing f/2 MTF.  See
http://www.zeiss.com/content/dam/Photography/new/pdf/en/downloadcenter/datasheets_batis/batis_225.pdf
 and http://diglloyd.com/blog/2015/20150429_0952-ZeissBatis-25f2-MTF.html
.  However, some have commented that it's not really a top notch lens.  I'm
not sure what their issues are.  It's not a Leica 50mm Apo ASPH, but I'm
not sure I've ever seen a 24 of 25mm that can match the Batis MTF at wide
apertures.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com



On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:

> Paul,
> The 35 Canon is interesting. Have you found a 24/2.8 or faster that works
> other than a native Sony or Batis?
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Paul Roark <roark.paul at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I regularly use the Leica 75mm f/2.5 and WATE (16 - 21) on the a7rii.  I
> > have found that the edge performance of all M-mount optics I have from
> 50mm
> > down are affected by edge smear (caused by the thicker sensor filter).
> The
> > WATE is free of it because it is a (very good) retrofocus zoom design.
> >
> > Amusingly, I bought a 30 year old 35mm Canon FD f/2.8 to get a very good
> > (at f/8) manual focus 35mm for landscape work.
> >
> > I have generally preferred manual focus with an accurate infinity stop
> for
> > landscape work.  With the original a7r the auto focus was rather weak.
> > That also caused me to favor MF.  However, the new a7rii AF may be good
> > enough that part of the reason to stay with MF is gone.
> >
> > I use the (perhaps overpriced) Voigtlander VM-E adapter with the M-mount
> > optics so that I can accurately set the infinity stop.  I have modified
> the
> > VM-E lock so that it locks at that point.  I also use tape to be sure
> > nothing moves on that mount by accident.
> >
> > Paul
> > www.PaulRoark.com
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Douglas Nygren via LUG <
> > lug at leica-users.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I've been thinking of buying a Sony A7RII and putting Leica M lenses on
> > > it.What are the pros and cons of doing this?
> > > Am I right to think that wider angle lenses do less well on the camera?
> > > My thought is that I'd use the first trip-elmar on it, the 28, 35, 50mm
> > > lens.
> > > I also have a smilax 50 and 35, but my goal is to travel light. Less is
> > > more.
> > > The alternative is to buy a Fuji XT-1 with he kit zoom and an
> additional
> > > 56mm lens.
> > > When shooting with a Leica camera, I always preferred wider angle
> > > lenses. A 35mm was about as long as I would go. I like showing things
> in
> > > their environment, though I also like portraits.
> > > I'm interest to hear what you all say.
> > > I thank you all in advance.
> > > Best--Doug
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Leica Users Group.
> > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Bob Adler
> www.robertadlerphotography.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


More information about the LUG mailing list