[Leica] [OM] IMGS: Baracoa, + Banding?
Tina Manley
tmanley at gmail.com
Mon May 11 14:41:06 PDT 2015
Thanks, Jay. That's very helpful. The only one of those it could be is
the newer SD card. I bought new, fast 32 and 64 GB cards to take to Cuba.
I guess I'll go back to my old, slow ones.
Tina
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Jay Burleson <leica at jayburleson.com> wrote:
> Tina, there are various theories / reasons why it can happen.
>
> "Leica noted that a brightened photo at base-ISO can occasionally show
> banding in shadows."
>
> "Shooting in continuous mode, the first image is almost always clean and
> the remaining images are 30% - 90% banded."
>
> "At iso 640 the banding still occurs if not allowing time for the buffer
> to clear."
>
> "Some newer SD cards show more banding than older low capacity slower
> cards"
>
> Lots of bloviating about it here:https://tinyurl.com/ol9gl3g
>
> Jay
>
>
> On 5/11/2015 7:15 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
>
>> Here is a blow-up of the banding in the corner of the photo:
>>
>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/160025912
>>
>> This is straight from the original DNG. When I try to lift the shadows,
>> the banding is very evident to me.
>>
>> Tina
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Scott Gomez <sgomez.baja at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not seeing any banding in any of the shots, Tina.
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:18 PM, ChrisB <ftog at threeshoes.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> I can’t see it when viewing ‘original’, Tina – on my little MacBook Air.
>>>> Are you sure it’s not only on your screen?
>>>>
>>>> I like that shot, by the way.
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> On 11 May 15, at 02:26, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've finished another page from Baracoa, including several from the MM
>>>>> about which I have a question:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/cuba&page=32 <
>>>>>
>>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/cuba&page=32>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This particular photo was very dark. The ISO is only 320 but there is
>>>>> severe banding in the shadows. Why? It's there in the original dng
>>>>> without any manipulation. If the ISO is 320, just like most of the
>>>>>
>>>> other
>>>
>>>> B&W's in low light, why is there so much banding in this one?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/160019998 <
>>>>>
>>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/160019998>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anybody know how to get rid of banding?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
More information about the LUG
mailing list