[Leica] Lightroom 6 speed issue?

Jayanand Govindaraj jayanand at gmail.com
Sat May 2 20:03:17 PDT 2015


I agree with mehrdad. - nowadays software drives computer upgrades, so
every time I upgrade, I try to do so with state of the art components at
that point of time, so I have a machine good for at least three years. I
upgraded 15 months ago to a motherboard that takes 64GB RAM - IMHO, RAM is
critical for fast image processing - by default if you use such a
motherboard you will need a recent processor. Because I play games on the
PC, the graphics processor keeps getting updated regularly as well! I also
use two SSDs - one for the operating system/applications, and one
exclusively for the swap files/scratch disk.

No problems at all with speed...

Cheers
Jayanand

On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 1:45 AM, mehrdad <msadat at gmail.com> wrote:

> over all every new version of most software becomes slower and bigger and
> thats a fact of life. that machine u are using is way too slow for lr. u
> need a 4 core 16gb ram and sd disk. that us the new norm aram. time to
> upgrade. for me its about the same speed as lr5. i am running a 12 core 48
> gb desktop.
>
>
>   -------------------------------------
>   regards, mehrdad
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Lightroom 6 has been blazingly fast for me, but I can't really compare it
> > to LR5 because I changed to a much faster computer at the same time LR6
> > came out.  With SSD hard drives, I don't have to wait for anything in LR
> or
> > PS.  It's so much faster that I have probably saved months of time in the
> > few days I have had the computer!!
> >
> > Tina
> >
> > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Aram Langhans <leica_r8 at hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I upgraded to 6 the first day, but have not had time to use it much as
> > that
> > > was the day before we left on our trip home.  We are about half way
> there
> > > (Monterey, CA) and we have internet in our campground and power, so I
> > have
> > > been playing around.  It is very slow compared with 5. Especially slow
> > > booting and slow switching from library to develop. And it takes longer
> > to
> > > import and change from NEF to DNG.  It use to do that in one process,
> but
> > > now it takes two.  Loads all the NEF files then does the conversion.
> > Maybe
> > > there is a way around that.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I am on my traveling  HP laptop, an I-5 second generation, with 4 GB of
> > RAM
> > > and most of my hard drive empty.  No GPU.  I sure hope it is better on
> my
> > > desktop when I finally get home.  Just wondering if anyone else has
> seen
> > > any
> > > speed differences.  I know they said it was supposed to be noticeably
> > > faster
> > > since it was all new 64 bit code.  So far not impressed, at least about
> > > that.  I have played around with a few new features that will allow me
> to
> > > not go to Photoshop as often.  I like that idea.  I use PS less and
> less
> > > and
> > > LR has added more and more features since version 1.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Aram
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Aram Langhans
> > >
> > > (Semi) Retired  Science Teacher
> > > & Unemployed photographer
> > >
> > > "The Human Genome Project has proved Darwin more right than Darwin
> > himself
> > > would ever have dared dream."   James D. Watson
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Leica Users Group.
> > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


More information about the LUG mailing list