[Leica] Shoot less... ?

[Steve Barbour]

> On Mar 23, 2015, at 1:57 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm saying here Steve that when you shoot larger format you shoot less
> exposures and no one complains.


4 images is four images, rabs.




geeze does it never stop…


s



> 
> 
> On 3/23/15 6:12 AM, "Steve Barbour" <steve.barbour at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> Steve Barbour
>> 
>> On Mar 23, 2015, at 3:03 AM, Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I have never heard of photographers considering their work by the acreage of
>> film they use rather than the number of worthwhile results they get. Is this
>> common?
>> 
>> Good question, I am familiar with the idea..."it"s not what you shoot, it"s
>> what you show" and the usual tendency of photographers to underestimate the
>> number of frames they exposed,,,
>> 
>> s
>> 
>>> On 21 Mar, 2015, at 20:14, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> A dozen sheets of 8x10 equal 144 shots with a Rolleiflex or Hasselblad.
>>> 432 shots with in 35mm. Also par for the course. A very common occurrence.
>>> 
>>> I shot 10 rolls a pro pack of Delta 100 of one model once in a few hours.
>>> So I had 360 chances to get it right.
>>> That was the most concentrated I ever got.
>>> My Balcars afterwards were quite warm. But they cooled down in time.
>>> I needed a cold shower for sure.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photographer
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information