[Leica] LUG Family

Sun Mar 22 11:12:16 PDT 2015

On behalf of "look again later," unfortunately had slipped through the few
brain  cells I still retain..

In my case I still have  a great......... read huge numbers of
negatives/slides from assignments beginnig 50 years ago and in particular
"special assignments that haven't been looked at in 40 years or more?

HOWEVER!! It is most essential we go back into those "special keeper files"
because we will inevitably find some amazing images we passed by because at
the time, "yes we kind of saw something there but didn't recognize until
later years with 30 more years of "photographic picture SEEING EXPERINCE!"
And a sense of better editing

I have often said to myself . 'HOW THE HELL DID I MISS THAT?"  And it is a
photo  from a previous shoot only 40 years ago. "LENGTH OF TIME WHEN
RE-LOOKING AGAIN?" Can be the most revealing of some of the best photos you
have ever exposed.

So on behalf of all and our somewhat barking bit of editing diatribe please
accept my possible "bite yer bottoms comments!"

cheers,
Dr. ted 

-----Original Message-----
From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Mark Rabiner
Sent: March-21-15 10:24 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG Family

I agree with this completely.
I think getting space away from your pictures is invaluable. Giving them
some time off away from you.
To be able to see them later. And make it so you're almost seeing them for
the first time. I call it regaining my perspective.
Its always what I'm striving for with my work so I can better determine its
true value.
Shots I'd done the day before all look the same. Pretty Good.

I think some of this also applies to printing.  You have to see them later
to know which ones are the ones you want to show people.

I just finished pissing off a client because I couldn't make editing
decisions until a few days later. And I told him I'd have them for him in a
couple of days. A couple as in two.

On 3/22/15 12:22 AM, "Jayanand Govindaraj" <jayanand at gmail.com> wrote:

> Tina,
> For What It Is Worth. I am not a professional, but I enjoy taking good
> photographs as well.
> 
> I, too, end up with 10-15k photographs after every safari. On the road, I
> just store them in three different places (External Hard Drive + two
> Hyperdrives). After I return, I do not look at them for 2-3 weeks, a tip
> from John Shaw, because it makes editing them easier as you are more
> divorced from the emotions that you had when taking the shots. After that
I
> sit down and very quickly and ruthlessly prune it down to 1000 shots or so
> - and I mean ruthless - any flaw and I junk it, and I completely trust my
> first impressions - this just takes me 2-3 days. Then I again leave the
> pruned list for a week or so, then carefully go through it and whittle it
> down to a manageable 500 or so. If I miss a few potentially good ones by
> this method, it does not bother me too much.
> 
> However, as one of my permanent backups, I keep the entire set of RAW
files
> on one of the drives inside the hyperdrive intact - storage is cheap, and
> who knows? :-)
> 
> Cheers
> Jayanand
> 
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Well, I have learned over the past few days that the LUG family is just
as
>> dysfunctional as any real family.
>> 
>> I really appreciate the off-list, on-list and phone messages of support.
I
>> would not still be a participant here without them.
>> 
>> I will not be posting daily photos for review.  I will be posting them on
>> pBase with an update to the LUG whenever I fill a page of photos.  You
can
>> look or not.  You can comment or not.  I will edit by myself or hire
>> somebody eventually.
>> 
>> More than one of you commented that my style of photography has changed
>> since the days of B&W and Noctilux and families in Honduras.  I can no
>> longer travel to Honduras and stay with families for a week at a time.  I
>> can no longer focus the Noctilux.  I am old.  I am still in business as a
>> professional photographer because it's too expensive to be a hobby for
me.
>> Color sells.  B&W doesn't.  If I could make a living with B&W, that is
what
>> I would shoot.
>> 
>> Thank you to those who understand.
>> 
>> Tina
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Tina Manley
>> www.tinamanley.com
>> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
>> 
>>
http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/
T
>> ina+Manley.html
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com