[Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part

[Sonny Carter]

Many of Nathan's emails are comments on other peoples pix.  He usually post maybe three emails a week with links to his own work, sometimes more.  

from my iPad

Sonny Carter

> On Mar 21, 2015, at 2:57 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
> 
> I am not going to check, but Nathan may have sent 5 original emails with links to 70 images rather than an almost 1:1 ratio which may have resulted in +60 emails (to five groups).... I am not on three of those groups, what comments do they make?
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+john=mcmaster.co.nz at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Tina Manley
> Sent: Sunday, 22 March 2015 8:49 a.m.
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part
> 
> I'm going by Steve's comment:
> 
> "The difference perhaps (since we are counting) Nathan 20 pics per email, Tina
> 20 emails per pic."
> 
> Tina
> 
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:37 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
>> 
>> You are going by total emails rather than original emails with link(s) 
>> to an image?
>> 
>> john
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> For March LUG, so far:
>> 
>> Nathan - 106 e-mails
>> Tina - 155 e-mails
>> 
>> Not quite 20 to 1.
>> 
>> Tina
>> 
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Steve Barbour 
>> <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> Steve Barbour
>>> 
>>> On Mar 21, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Also, in the last week - since last Sunday, I have posted 13 photos 
>>> on the LUG.  You have posted 70.  Is the difference that you are 
>>> sharing and I am asking for help?
>>> 
>>> The difference perhaps (since we are counting) Nathan 20 pics per 
>>> email, Tina
>>> 20 emails per pic.
>>> 
>>> steve
>>> 
>>> I asked before about posting them one at a time or saving them up 
>>> and posting a group.  The opinions seemed to be divided equally - 
>>> some wanted one at at time, others preferred a group so I didn't 
>>> change
>> anything.
>>> Maybe I should.
>>> 
>>> Tina
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Nathan Wajsman 
>>> <photo at frozenlight.eu>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Tina,
>>>> 
>>>> May I ask a heretical question: are you perhaps taking too many 
>>>> photos, just because it is so easy with digital? You mention a 
>>>> figure of 16000
>>> from
>>>> your Cuba trip, That is more than I take in a year. Now, I realize 
>>>> that I am just an amateur while you are a pro, and I also 
>>>> understand that for
>>> your
>>>> stock business you need some slight variations of each image, but 
>>>> still
>>> the
>>>> number seems excessive. From the way you talk about the editing 
>>>> process,
>>> it
>>>> seems to lead to an intolerable burden afterwards, when editing them.
>>>> Perhaps a change from this machine-gun approach would be good for 
>>>> your health?
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Nathan
>>>> 
>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>> 
>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>>>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>>>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>>>> 
>>>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
>>>> 
>>>> YNWA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information