[Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: IMG: Dawn Memories

[philippe.amard]

the eyes are drawn toward the brighter patch of water on the right  
which is out of focus.
Now your choice boils down to crossing your fingers that the viewer  
will get back some time or other towards the character, or,
crop ...

Amities
Philippe

Le 19 mars 15 à 15:52, Tina Manley a écrit :

> The last one.  This one is at 1/60 instead of 1/90 but still looks  
> sharp to
> me.  I prefer the horizontal composition, though.
>
> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/159482008
>
> Tina
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Tarek Charara <tcharara at mac.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> Tina,
>>
>> They look in focus to my eyes… But it seems the first picture (in the
>> early morning?) might have minimal traces of blur as if the camera  
>> moved or
>> something… The second has traces of banding in the shadows,  
>> everything else
>> looks just fine.
>>
>> All the best from Paris!
>>
>> Tarek
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> Tarek Charara
>> <http://www.tarekcharara.com>
>>
>> NO ARCHIVE
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Le 19 mars 2015 à 14:39, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>> OK this is driving me crazy.  I didn't sleep at all last night and I
>> can't
>>> continue to edit my Cuba photos until I get this sorted out.  This  
>>> photo
>>> was made with my 50 Summilux, the sharpest lens I have.  The way I  
>>> judge
>>> sharpness is to view the photo at 100% - just like the stock  
>>> agencies
>> tell
>>> you to.  Here is a 100% enlargement of that photo:
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/159481904
>>>
>>> Is that sharp or not?  If not, there is something wrong with my  
>>> eyes.
>>>
>>> Here is a shot a short time later with a little more light:
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/159481902
>>>
>>> Here is a 100% enlargement of that shot:
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/image/159481905
>>>
>>> Is it sharp?  Am I going blind?
>>>
>>> Please let me know.
>>>
>>> Tina
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Ted Grant <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Tina,
>>>>
>>>> Technical wise I have no idea what's causing the effect because  
>>>> I've
>> never
>>>> given one twit of technical thought about photography! I just  
>>>> enjoy my
>>>> photographic love affair without question! :-) :-) HOWEVER? :-)
>>>>
>>>> 1/ It kind of doesn't look sharp?
>>>> 2/ If you kind of move your head about while looking at the  
>>>> screen it
>>>> looks sharp sort of when you kind of angle your head to screen..
>>>> 3/It looks like it's sharp but blown - up a zillion times shot on  
>>>> ASA 1O
>>>> film.
>>>> 4/Looking through the four sizes none of them seem to have what I'd
>> call a
>>>> sharp Leica edge line anywhere. All edges seem to have a tiny bit  
>>>> of a
>>>> glow. Which appears to remove sharpness.
>>>> 5/ My first re-action was it was taken through one of those  
>>>> lenses that
>>>> nothing is ever sharp-sharp. It's the kind, one of the old time  
>>>> photogs
>>>> used on green peppers & people got wet pants with excitement when  
>>>> used!
>>>> They look kind of sharp. But? Looked kind of just off the super- 
>>>> sharp
>> edge.
>>>> 6/ Never mind all the various computer screens..... Run off a  
>>>> 13X19 full
>>>> frame B&W print. Then come back and tell us what it looks like?
>>>>
>>>> Certainly an interesting effect. But it has absolutely nothing to  
>>>> do
>> with
>>>> whether you focused the lens properly. And if this is the "ONLY  
>>>> FRAME
>> YOU
>>>> SEE IT ON????????????????" Don't sweat it! Write it off as some  
>>>> kind of
>>>> ATMOSPHERE situation." :-)
>>>>
>>>> Life is too short knocking yourself out over one ordinary image.  
>>>> Neither
>>>> is wasting the time typing all the e-mails back and forth.
>>>>
>>>> Just go and sit down, pour yourself a nice single malt and smile  
>>>> while
>>>> enjoying all the thoughts of the hundreds, nay, thousands of  
>>>> amazing
>> CUBA
>>>> photos you came home with!  Now don't you feel better? NO! NO!  
>>>> Don't let
>>>> another thought about whatever this is enter your thoughts! And  
>>>> forget
>>>> "curiosity I just want to know???."
>>>>
>>>> Like, it just isn't worth all the time you and others have & are  
>>>> putting
>>>> on the screen. Sure folks curiosity want to know  what made this  
>>>> effect.
>>>> Good for them. BUT? It's all over one frame of thousands you  
>>>> exposed?
>>>>
>>>> I'm right! MAKE ONE 13x19 B&W PRINT! GAME AND ANSWER, it's  
>>>> OVER! :-)
>>>> Because in print form it's going to look just fine as a print!  
>>>> And that
>> my
>>>> dear lady is all that matters in the end! Besides all your other  
>>>> photos
>>>> completely over ride all this!!! :-)
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Dr. ted
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus  
>>>> software.
>>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tina Manley
>>> www.tinamanley.com
>>> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
>>>
>> http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Tina Manley
> www.tinamanley.com
> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
> http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible  
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE