[Leica] B/W conversion tutorial
Aram Langhans
leica_r8 at hotmail.com
Wed Jun 10 12:45:04 PDT 2015
I watched the video, too, and found it interesting, but.... I would say
more possible and definitely easier in lightroom. LR has 8 color channels
you can work with instead of just 6 in PS. It has the same curves, and
great basic sliders. And for local control, you have the brush with or
without masking, and at least a dozen controls you can apply to the brush.
And all done nondestuctively. I am always amazed at how little I now use
PS, which for many years was my mainstay. and with version 6, there are two
more things I do not have to use PS for. If they would include DOF stacking
and the content aware brush, I could dump PS totally.
Aram
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Philippe" <philippe.amard at sfr.fr>
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 3:22 AM
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Subject: Re: [Leica] B/W conversion tutorial
> And what Chris does in his video is now rather more than less possible
> using LR
>
> Amities
> Ph
>
>
> Le 10 juin 2015 à 11:33, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>>
>>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:29 PM, Herbert Kanner <kanner at acm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I wasn’t thinking of just “pressing” the B&W button. I was thinking of
>>> using the various contrast, luminosity, and saturation sliders for
>>> selected colors, presumably intelligently.
>>
>>
>> yes, you can.
>>
>> there is a wonderful book about all this, called (I will check) From Oz
>> to Kansas, or such, by Versace…
>>
>>
>> just great
>>
>>
>> steve
>>
>>
>>> Herbert Kanner
>>> kanner at acm.org
>>> 650-326-8204
>>>
>>> Question authority and the authorities will question you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jun 6, 2015, at 11:58 PM, Chris Crawford
>>>> <chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just converting in lightroom gives flat, lifeless results with no
>>>> microcontrast. That's the look that many film users think of when they
>>>> criticize digital black & white as 'inferior' to film. Digital
>>>> conversions
>>>> can be as beautiful as film, but it requires work. The plugins do the
>>>> best
>>>> job of boosting mid tone contrast and microcontrast without blowing out
>>>> shadows and highlights, but it can be done in Photoshop as my tutorial
>>>> shows.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Chris Crawford
>>>> Fine Art Photography
>>>> Fort Wayne, Indiana
>>>> 260-437-8990
>>>>
>>>> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio
>>>>
>>>> http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
>>>> Become a fan on Facebook
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/7/15, 2:44 AM, "Herbert Kanner" <kanner at acm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is wrong with simple black and white conversion in Lightroom?
>>>>> I've
>>>>> used it a few times and found it satisfactory. Am I not critical
>>>>> enough?
>>>>> Herbert Kanner
>>>>> kanner at acm.org
>>>>> 650-326-8204
>>>>>
>>>>> Question authority and the authorities will question you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jun 6, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Chris Crawford
>>>>>> <chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In-camera conversions usually look flat. Best to use Photoshop. The
>>>>>> best
>>>>>> results come from plugins like Silver Efx, Alienskin Exposure, DxO
>>>>>> Filmpack, and Topaz BW Effects. My favorite is Topaz, and it is also
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> least expensive at about $60.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you donąt want to buy a plugin, I have a video tutorial that I
>>>>>> made
>>>>>> showing how to do it in Photoshop with good results:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://youtu.be/ZdJ5rM_MGlU?list=PLsQTNpmJWGmTFNLzY3g1CgbBQ7-SvAWam
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Chris Crawford
>>>>>> Fine Art Photography
>>>>>> Fort Wayne, Indiana
>>>>>> 260-437-8990
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
>>>>>> Become a fan on Facebook
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/6/15, 11:46 AM, "Stan Yoder" <s.yoder at comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Folks, Which is the better way to convert color to B/W: in
>>>>>>> Photoshop,
>>>>>>> in the printer, or use the B/W provision of the camera (M240) in the
>>>>>>> first place? I don't need the high-end solutions of specialized
>>>>>>> software
>>>>>>> or inks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TIA,
>>>>>>> Stan Yoder
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
More information about the LUG
mailing list