[Leica] Shameless wedding photography plug new website

Steve Barbour steve.barbour at gmail.com
Fri Jul 3 12:00:45 PDT 2015



Sent from my iPhone
Steve Barbour

On Jul 3, 2015, at 11:44 AM, chris williams <zoeica at mac.com> wrote:

So I should offer some type of "after 12 yrs" package ?

full price for the first marriage, then if needed, the next three marriages...half price.


s


Chris Williams
www.zoeicaimages.net
504-231-6261


> On Jul 3, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 50% of my marriages lasted 12 years, the other 50% is at 33 years and looks like it's gonna keep going.
> 
> from my iPad
> 
> Sonny Carter
> 
>> On Jul 2, 2015, at 11:01 PM, grduprey at mchsi.com wrote:
>> 
>> Chris,
>> Wedding vows don't mean anything if you go into the marriage with the attitude that you can get out of it if you want to.  If you enter into marriage with the attitude of total commitment, then Divorce is Not An Option, then it will last, because you are committed to make it work.  Your statistics mean nothing to those of us who have this attitude.
>> 
>> Gene
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chris Crawford" <chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com>
>> To: "Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>" <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 2:12:12 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Shameless wedding photography plug new website
>> 
>> Ted,
>> 
>> You¹re living in the past. Wedding vows don¹t mean a damned thing. In the
>> USA, 50% of marriages end in divorce within the first 5 years. Because the
>> couple were stupid enough to invite the government into their
>> relationship, they have to pay lawyers and court fees for Œpermission¹ to
>> split up.
>> 
>> We have Œno fault¹ divorce now, the courts NEVER deny a couple permission
>> to divorce anymore, so I see no reason to involve them. In the past, you
>> could only divorce for a good reason, and those reasons were codified in
>> the law. Domestic violence, adultery, alcohol or drug addiction, and
>> abandonment were pretty much the only valid reasons judges would grant a
>> divorce. Not anymore; one of the people just has to be Œbored¹ or wants
>> someone else, etc.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Chris Crawford
>> Fine Art Photography
>> Fort Wayne, Indiana
>> 260-437-8990
>> 
>> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio
>> 
>> http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
>> Become a fan on Facebook
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 7/2/15, 1:00 PM, "LUG on behalf of Ted Grant"
>> <lug-bounces+chris=chriscrawfordphoto.com at leica-users.org on behalf of
>> tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:
>> 
>>> Well then, all that shows is how easy it is to get knocked-up and not have
>>> the responsibilities of rearing the child or children! That may not be the
>>> case. But it sure leaves the "Barn door open" for easy departure!
>>> 
>>> I would much rather be married with the responsibilities that go along
>>> with
>>> that "union!" Than have no proper vows that let these un-married folks
>>> walk
>>> out the door anytime they feel like it! If that might be a statistic or
>>> fact?? 
>>> 
>>> Dr. ted Grant
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf
>>> Of
>>> Jayanand Govindaraj
>>> Sent: July-02-15 9:44 AM
>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Shameless wedding photography plug new website
>>> 
>>> The fact remains that for the first time in the USA, in 2013 (or maybe
>>> 2014), if memory serves me right, more children were born to unmarried
>>> parents than to married ones. All of you are clearly in the minority
>>> today....
>>> Cheers
>>> Jayanand
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:16 PM, <grduprey at mchsi.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 100 % agree.
>>>> 
>>>> Gene
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant at shaw.ca>
>>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 1:42:59 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Shameless wedding photography plug new website
>>>> 
>>>> Well I figure I might throw this in! :-)
>>>> 
>>>> Irene and I were married 15 October 1949 and were  married 64 years
>>>> before
>>>> she passed away leaving the biggest hole in my 86 life years! :-(
>>>> 
>>>> Sure we had our "chit chats!!! x53xx+++ bang bang etc! etc.
>>>> 
>>>> Example!  Show me a couple who've never had a yapping session at each
>>>> other during 64 years? We joked about "GUNS NOT BEING LEGAL IN CANADA!"
>>> And
>>>> a good thing !  :-) As she offered, "I'd most certainly given her reason
>>> to
>>>> use one on me a few times!" :-) :-) :-) Then she'd give me a big hug!
>>>> 
>>>> Don't need a lawyer if you have real love in your heart's for each
>>>> other!!!!!
>>>> 
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Dr. ted  :-)
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


More information about the LUG mailing list