[Leica] PHOTOG BAD NEWS!!!! :-)

Jim Shulman jshulman at judgecrater.com
Fri Jan 23 18:57:25 PST 2015


Which they can get dirt cheap from freelancers and wire services.  I just
checked the front page of the New York Times website and saw, count 'em,
ONE picture taken by a staffer.  The rest of them were from freelancers
(when it says: Joe Blow for the New York Times) or wire services.  In the
case of my local paper, the Philadelphia Inquirer, many of the philly.com
stories are illustrated by IStock/Getty images.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Crawford
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 9:32 PM
To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
Subject: Re: [Leica] PHOTOG BAD NEWS!!!! :-)

Electronic versions of newspapers and magazines still need photosŠ

--
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-437-8990

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
Become a fan on Facebook



On 1/23/15, 9:09 PM, "Jayanand Govindaraj" <jayanand at gmail.com> wrote:

>I just think this is part of the accelerating trend of the end of print
>journalism. For example, I have long subscribed to around 25 magazines,
>and I get a hard copy of just one still - The Economist, due to the
>fact that it was a long term subscription. Sign of the times, and the
>good news emanating out of this trend is it will save a few trees, here
>and there.....
>Cheers
>Jayanand
>
>Sent from my iPad
>
>> On 24-Jan-2015, at 06:54, RicCarter <ric at cartersxrd.net> wrote:
>>
>> Damn, I wish you were right, but this is the country in which a large
>>percentage of the public buys into fox news...
>>
>> ric
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2015, at 8:21 PM, Tmanley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> They are "hoping" that the photographers will continue to contribute!
>>>Hah!!! I hope the photographers boycott forever. Let SI depend on
>>>crowd sourcing for "good enough" photos. No one will know the
difference!!
>>>Hah!!!
>>>
>>> Tina
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


More information about the LUG mailing list