[Leica] Which has more central Resolution: Sony 28-70 or Leica 28-70?

[George Lottermoser]

On Dec 6, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Frank Filippone wrote:

> Wonderful,  and my methods, which are more scientific, which is how I was trained, are therefore false?  Worthless? Of no value to the general community? Or time wasting?
> 
> Why?  In what way?   
> 
> Why was there even response like this?  Did someone see it as a public challenge to their methodologies?
> 
> Isn't their room for BOTH ( or more) approaches, without negative connotations ( or responses) to either?
> 
> It is time to use the delete button if you are not interested in reading something..... about technical, artistic, and every other kind of issue.....
> 
> Just because you own a keyboard, is no reason to be impolite or intolerant or argumentative...... or just plain negative.
> 
> Use the delete key.  More often, apparently.

Clearly: those who choose to perform "actual controlled tests"
have, I assume, good reasons for doing so.

Just as: those who don't care about "actual controlled tests"
beyond going out and shooting pictures, with "untested" gear,
also have, I assume, their reasons for taking that approach.

Personally: I do both as fits my sense of "need to know."
I had the "need to know" by controlled tests
how two different IR filters rendered scenes;
given identical lens, camera, lighting, et al.
I learned what needed to learn.

Whether my tests were informative or useful to anyone else
is up to them.

YOUR MILEAGE WILL MOST CERTAINLY VARY
according to how you drive (shoot or whatever)

Regards,
George Lottermoser 

http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist