[Leica] IMG: The Knitter, II

[Tmanley]

Thanks, Ted! Your comments are always greatly appreciated.

Tina

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 4, 2014, at 6:33 PM, "Ted Grant" <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:
> 
> Tina SHOWED:
> Subject: [Leica] IMG: The Knitter, II
>> Here is a closer one of the elderly knitter:
> http://www.pbase.com/image/158445342
> 
> "I like his eyes and hands, but his whole hat is not in this one."""""
> 
> Hi Tina,
> 'STRONG & POWERFUL right in yer face!" LOVE IT.:-0
> 
> So we don't see the complete hat?  BIG DEAL! The face and look is so very
> strong the missing part of the hat isn't relevant!
> Besides it's so simple to address anyone having a negative remark about the
> hat not being there etc etec etec.
> 
> 1/ If we never saw the "face with hat" no one would have a problem seeing
> the image full face and hat crop.
> ERGO: no problem whatsoever! Yes some are going to come back with "I like
> the full face and complete hat is the best!!
> 
> ME? Who cares as they're both equally strong powerful photos, but wouldn't
> likely be used side by each as we were shown here. Try being a photo editor
> and doing a page layout with photos fitting a story?
> 
> No opinion problems with me as they're equally strong and would be used in
> various manners. So in that case we as viewers would be just as much in awe
> seeing each on different days in different magazine articles.
> 
> One story might be about the hat! ERGO: full hat photo used! Obviously.
> The other story about hands? Whatever?
> Sure fine to have a like == dislike opinion. And rightly so when they're
> sitting side by each.
> 
> In any event Tina my dear lady. You just blew everyone away one more time
> once again! :-)
> 
> cheers,
> Dr. ted :-) 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information