[Leica] Dunes Redux

philippe.amard philippe.amard at sfr.fr
Thu Nov 13 09:15:37 PST 2014


The first one is more graphic and the second one just photographic ;-)

My vote goes to #1 as a result even if #2 demonstrates the sensor has  
spare power to deliver ;-)

Perhaps #1 with slightly more details in the highlights might be  
another way to explore.

Amitiés
Philippe

Le 13 nov. 14 à 17:41, Howard Ritter a écrit :

> For my tastes, the original without hesitation. The foreground  
> ripples add a lot of textural visual interest and the inky blackness  
> of the shadows is more important than the detail that can be teased  
> out with post-processing.
>
> YMMV. De gustibus and all that.
>
> —howard
>
>
>> On Nov 13, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> Definitely the revised one for me.  Very nice.
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> On 11/12/2014 9:53 PM, Robert Adler wrote:
>>> Some suggestions were made to the first image of the Oceano Dunes  
>>> that
>>> included:
>>> 1.  Lighten the dune shadows to show some detail.
>>> 2.  Crop out some of the foreground.
>>>
>>> So I did this and the result is here:
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/rgacpa_HI/20141103-L1002368+as+Smart+Object.jpg.html
>>>
>>> Here is the original image before the suggestions.
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/rgacpa_HI/20141103-L1002368-Edit.jpg.html
>>>
>>> Please look at each large. Though I know which one I prefer  
>>> (limited to
>>> only these two to pick from) I'd really appreciate hearing your  
>>> opinions.
>>> Thanks!
>>> Bob
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible  
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE






More information about the LUG mailing list