[Leica] Digital M product no breakdown

[CJ andS]

I thought sticking with film made me an esoteric idiot....Although not poor.

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> If I swung the money I'd have a hard time deciding between the current M
> and
> the Monochrom down to the last minute.. Its certainly foolish to not have
> both? I mean what would be the point?!?  I certainly hope they keep
> developing the Monochrom and don't let it just sit there.  The next version
> should have selenium toning built in.. With a button you press on the left.
>
> On 10/12/14 4:00 AM, "Peter A. Klein" <pklein at threshinc.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm already esoteric. I try not to be an idiot.  I'm not rich, and if I
> > buy an M 240, I would be even less so. For some reason, I'm more drawn
> > to the Monchorom than the M 240. If I bought a Monochrom, I would be
> > equally not rich and even more esoteric. And a lot of people would think
> > I was an idiot.
> >
> > I feel like Rodney Dangerfield.  :-)
> >
> > --Peter
> >
> > Mark Rabiner wrote:
> >> So when we spend seven grand on an M instead of a Canon or Nikon body
> > we are
> >> in good company and not feeling like some kinds of rich esoteric idiot.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photographer
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Chris Saganich
www.imagebrooklyn.com