[Leica] Digital M product no breakdown

[Douglas Sharp]

They ought to use the suffix "K"

6K for 6,000 euros, 8K for 8,000 and so on;-)

Douglas


On 10.10.2014 02:47, Richard Man wrote:
> When they started to call the products Leica M, and Leica S, Leica X etc.
> some said, that will cause confusion! and Leicapjiles raised up and said,
> no it won't, it's Leica M Type 240, and S 006 etc. Now we see the effect,
> we have
> Leica M, M-P which is different from MP, M Edition 60, M this and that.
>
> So much clearer now!! Ha!
>
> Give me the old M2, M3, M4, M4P etc. naming any day!
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:42 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> 10770/10772 black and the others chrome. So just look at what is new with
>> the M-P (240) over the M(240) and see if you want to pay for that, then
>> choose your finish ;-)
>>
>>      Scratch resistant display-cover made of sapphire glass
>>      Long-lasting readiness to capture due to a large double sized image
>> buffer of 2GB (possible to shoot up to 24 images in full continuous speed
>> of 3 fps)
>>      Pure look without the Leica Logo and "M" lettering on the front side
>>      Manual viewfinder frame selection with the traditional 'frame selector'
>>
>> john
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> Any place I can go to view the differences between 10770 , 1, 2, 3 etc...?
>> The Leica website is less than helpful.
>>
>>
>> -Lew Schwartz
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>