[Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film

Jayanand Govindaraj jayanand at gmail.com
Sun Oct 5 20:08:06 PDT 2014


I still cannot see much difference, at least viewing these tiny jpgs, but
then my eyesight is not as sharp as it should be!
I reiterate, IMHO, that for the style of photography you do, equipment
really does not matter, whether it is film, M8, M9 or MM - except for it to
be second nature to you in operation. They all seem to carry the same
signature, have a similar impact and look pretty much the same on my
calibrated monitor!
Cheers
Jayanand


On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Lluis Ripoll <
lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have scanned two film backlights from the year 2007 with Kodak Plus X,
> Leica MP, lens ignored. Plustek scanner and Vuescan :
>
> Carrer del Correu Vell
> <
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031228LR5BN.jpg.html
> >
>
> The Light Way
> <
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031216LR5BN.jpg.html
> >
>
> Please compare to the Leica Monochrom with Tri Elmar recently posted:
>
> <
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141003_L1001068__MMLR5BN.jpg.html
> >
>
> All these pictures have a slightly touch of Silver Efex Pro, same toning
> applied to all.
>
> In my opinion I can’t say any better quality on film vs MM, except the
> grain of course, I’ve don’t put it on the MM version, I consider it is
> artificial. What do you think?
>
> Thanks for looking, your c&c are greatly appreciated
>
> Saludos cordiales
> Lluis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


More information about the LUG mailing list