Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2022/11/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I find Gigapixel useful on many of my older images that were scanned as early as 1994. Back then the hard drives were small, scanners slow, and sending images over modems took some time. The result is I have hundreds of images scanned that are only about 300-500 pixels high. Add that to my terrible negative filing system, it is often easy to take a nicely scanned older image and blow it up to modern viewing sizes. Because of my camera?s low light performance, I rarely find noise an issue but I do have some cause, and Denise works much better than PS for that. I think Photo AI is a combo of all the others. I don?t have it and so far don't think I need it. SonC On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:02 AM Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote: > I recently bought Topaz Sharpen AI and have been using it on some images, > with good results. Now Topaz has a promotion (silly Cyber Monday BS, but > still), where I can get Topaz Photo AI, Gigapixel AI and Denoise AI for > ?109. > > The price is right, but will those apps be worth it? I am not referring to > the money, but rather the additional steps in the workflow. Gigapixel does > not seem useful since I cannot remember when I last wanted to enlarge a > photo, but will the others bring me added results that are worthwhile? > > TIA, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > photo at frozenlight.eu > > http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.frozenlight.eu > > ????? ???????! ?????? ?????! > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Regards, Sonny http://sonc.com <http://sonc.com/look/> Natchitoches, Louisiana 1714 Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase USA