[Leica] Medium Format Rolleiflex vs Super Ikonta III

[imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry)]

Yes, the Rolleiflex is better, Lluis. My favourite is "In the Coffee Shop".
Douglas


On 30/08/2022 23:34, Lluis Ripoll via LUG wrote:
> I have compared photographs from two 6x6 cameras Rolleiflex with a Planar 
> 80mm f 2.8 and Zeiss Super Ikonta III 531/16 with a Tessar 75mm f 3.5. In 
> both I have used the same Ilford FP4 E.I. 100 film, both films have been 
> developed together in the same tank. The photo that best shows the 
> different performance is in Roots. Anyway the Zeiss Super Ikonta requires 
> a calibration of the rangefinder, today I have taken it to the seller's 
> workshop to adjust it.
>
> In the Cofee Shop
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Medium+Format/2022F080412.jpg.html>
> Rolleiflex E, Zeiss Planar 80mm f 2.8, Ilford FP4, D-23 1:1
>
> Light geometry
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Medium+Format/2022F080411.jpg.html>
> Rolleiflex E, Zeiss Planar 80mm f 2.8, Ilford FP4, D-23 1:1
>
> Roots
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Medium+Format/2022F080505.jpg.html>
> Zeiss Super Ikonta III 531/16, Ilford FP4, D-23 1:1
>
> Roots bis
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Medium+Format/2022F080402.jpg.html>
> Rolleiflex E, Zeiss Planar 80mm f 2.8, Ilford FP4, D-23 1:1
>
> Resting on the shadows
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Medium+Format/2022F080509.jpg.html>
> Zeiss Super Ikonta III 531/16, Ilford FP4, D-23 1:1
>
> Resting on the Park
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Medium+Format/2022F080504.jpg.html>
> Zeiss Super Ikonta III 531/16, Ilford FP4, D-23 1:1
>
> Thanks for looking, your c&c are wecome
>
> Saludos cordiales
> Lluis
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information