Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2022/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]A hands on brief review of the M11 by a middle-ageing fan boy from DPReview just posted on Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzSv9rc4VyU Douglas On 13/01/2022 16:20, Don Dory via LUG wrote: > Paul, for a deliberative photographer you are exactly correct. I have > found, much like the Q2 shooters that having more pixels can be useful. > These past couple of years I have reacted emotionally to a scene but when > reviewing the images find that what I was reacting to was a small portion > of the scene. The new software does amazing things to our files: having > enough pixels to start with is better all things considered. > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022, 10:14 AM Paul Roark via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> > wrote: > >> Regarding the benefits of higher sensor resolution, I found that my 61mp >> model and 25mp model Sony cameras produce images that are visually >> equal, at least the way I process the files. I now carry the 25mp compact >> model Alpha 7c only. (The Sony bodies are modified by KoloriVision's >> Ultra >> Thin sensor cover to make them Leica M lens compatible.) I do run the >> image files through Topaz's AI Gigapixel (which does make a difference). >> I >> can barely detect the difference in sensor resolution when otherwise >> identical test shots are displayed on the monitor at several hundred times >> the native monitor resolution. Carrying a heavier load for the difference >> between 25 and 60 MP resolution is, in my view, a bad trade off. >> >> FWIW >> >> Paul >> www.PaulRoark.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information