Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2021/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I posted a same-size screen grab of the Leica 135 and Canon 200 at https://www.paulroark.com/Leica-apo-135-v-Canon-L-70-200-at-200.JPG . They look very similar, but I think the ridge line of the 135 M has a slight advantage. Paul www.PaulRoark.com On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 8:59 AM Sonny Carter via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote: > pix? > > > Regards, > > Sonny > http://sonc.com <http://sonc.com/look/> > Natchitoches, Louisiana > 1714 > Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase > > USA > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:57 AM Paul Roark via LUG <lug at > leica-users.org> > wrote: > > > I thought this group would appreciate the results of this telephoto > > comparison test. The question was, between my Canon 70 - 200 f/4 L > series > > lens at 200mm and my Leica 135mm, which could actually render distant > > details the best. Both were on a Sony a7c. The Leica 135 won. And > this > > was at optimum apertures and center. Off axis and wide open the > > differences would be more pronounced. (The Canon zoom will soon be on > > eBay.) > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >