Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2020/09/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Suggestions for 35mm B/W neg scanner?
From: enitka1 at comcast.net (enitka)
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:24:56 -0600
References: <B3186DDA-9EE4-4A7C-A1B8-13C2AFB20BBE@cox.net> <CA+yJO1B-utRqedSje-CTyvWG=d3D34H8vGw66OHW+Ssw=--1WA@mail.gmail.com> <673731FE-521F-4063-BA74-0FCDC5F4B9F1@frozenlight.eu> <DE13E491-FDF2-48F0-955D-E77B18C354BD@chriscrawfordphoto.com> <A8242999-4985-4010-8606-AC55E3561EEB@frozenlight.eu> <CAF8hL-FuK5ypgyo2eAmT=YJfN=3L9uNTQRvCKQW2p9YfNKoMmw@mail.gmail.com> <0cbe4f08-461d-4c12-0f81-871bf9c67093@gmail.com>

I use a LS4000 on a Mac current OS - you can get adapters that make it work. 
 It is hard to kill this machine.  I?ve had it at least 17 years now and 
it?s a real workhorse.  I use it with Vuescan

Ernie Nitka

> On Sep 14, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Frank Filippone via LUG <lug at 
> leica-users.org> wrote:
> 
> The LS4000 has a IEEE1394 (Firewire) interface.  I would not recommend it 
> for the general audience.  It will be more difficult than the LS5000 to 
> install,especially on a Windows machine.
> 
> The SL5000 uses USB.
> 
> On 9/13/2020 8:40 PM, Richard Man wrote:
>> I have used a lot of scanners, and still have 3 (actually five, but who's
>> counting). Anyway, it depends on your needs and budget, but the
>> LS-5000/4000 would be a good general purpose. Using Vuescan will save you 
>> a
>> lot of headaches
>> 
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 4:09 AM Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I stand corrected, then. Back when I shot film exclusively, I had a Nikon
>>> LS-2000, but I don?t remember what software I used with it. I do remember
>>> trying Vuescan already back then, and I have also tried it with a cheap
>>> film scanner I bought a couple of years ago (Plustek, I think) that I 
>>> ended
>>> up getting rid of. I also tried it with my Epson, but found Epson Scan
>>> better and easier. But sure, if the old Nikon scanners need it to work on
>>> modern computers, then there is no other option.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Nathan
>>> 
>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>> 
>>> Alicante, Spain
>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
>>> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <
>>> http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <
>>> http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>>> 
>>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <
>>> http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
>>> 
>>> YNWA
>>> 
>>> "I?m not arguing, I?m just explaining why I?m right"
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 13 Sep 2020, at 08:57, Christopher Crawford <
>>> chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com> wrote:
>>>> Nathan,
>>>> 
>>>> Vuescan is pretty much a necessity for the Nikon scanners, so Tina was
>>> right to recommend it for the LS-5000ED. Nikon's scanning software, Nikon
>>> Scan, does not work on Intel Macs and only works on Windows 10 if you 
>>> jump
>>> through some hacking hoops (and I think this is true with windows7 and 8 
>>> as
>>> well).
>>>> Even when it was new, Nikon Scan sucked. It was slow and buggy and often
>>> crashed. I bought my Nikon 8000ED scanner 19 years ago and bought Vuescan
>>> shortly after because Nikon scan was so awful. Nikon Scan's interface was
>>> nicer then Vuescan's, but the stability and speed of Vuescan made it 
>>> worth
>>> the inconvenience.
>>>> With a newer computer, Vuescan is pretty much the only game in town.
>>> Silverfast used to make a version for the Nikon scanners (and maybe still
>>> offer it, I don't know), but it was incredibly overpriced ($700 for the
>>> version needed for my scanner!) and from what I've heard it was buggy 
>>> too.
>>>> I haven't used the Epson scanner you have, but I recently bought an
>>> Epson V600 for scanning prints. Epson's software works fine for it and is
>>> easier to use then Vuescan.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Chris Crawford
>>>> Fine Art Photography
>>>> Fort Wayne, Indiana
>>>> 260-437-8990
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
>>>> Like My Work on Facebook
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ?On 9/13/20, 1:40 AM, "LUG on behalf of Nathan Wajsman"
>>> <lug-bounces+chris=chriscrawfordphoto.com at leica-users.org on behalf of
>>> photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote:
>>>>    I second that recommendation. Unfortunately, it is hard to find and
>>> expensive, so I use the cheaper option of an Epson V700 (which also lets 
>>> me
>>> scan MF film which I shoot from time to time). My only disagreement
>>> concerns Vuescan. I have tried to like it over the years, but I find the
>>> user interface so clunky that I have given up on it. I just use the Epson
>>> Scan software that came with the scanner.
>>>>    Cheers,
>>>>    Nathan
>>>> 
>>>>    Nathan Wajsman
>>>> 
>>>>    Alicante, Spain
>>>>    http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
>>>>    http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
>>>>    PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <
>>> http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <
>>> http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
>>>>    Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <
>>> http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
>>>>    YNWA
>>>> 
>>>>    "I?m not arguing, I?m just explaining why I?m right"
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 13 Sep 2020, at 00:42, Tina Manley via LUG <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Nikon LS5000 with Vuescan.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tina
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 3:07 PM Stasys Petravicius via LUG <
>>>>> lug at leica-users.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Stasys Petravicius
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Tina Manley
>>>>> www.tinamanley.com
>>>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley
>>>>> <
>>> http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>    Leica Users Group.
>>>>    See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
> -- 
> 
> *Frank Filippone*
> 
> *BMWRed735i at Gmail.com*
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Suggestions for 35mm B/W neg scanner?)
In reply to: Message from stasys1 at cox.net (Stasys Petravicius) ([Leica] Suggestions for 35mm B/W neg scanner?)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Suggestions for 35mm B/W neg scanner?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Suggestions for 35mm B/W neg scanner?)
Message from chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com (Christopher Crawford) ([Leica] Suggestions for 35mm B/W neg scanner?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Suggestions for 35mm B/W neg scanner?)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Suggestions for 35mm B/W neg scanner?)
Message from bmwred735i at gmail.com (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Suggestions for 35mm B/W neg scanner?)