Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2020/01/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nikon Z50: 3 Dog Photos, 2 Others
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:39:12 -0500
References: <CAJ4y7gyZ1RW1q6gCKSspDCnwYup24g-X+vxigTzAYoiDpcjWQg@mail.gmail.com> <23C06D9D-FAB8-4C8E-BFD3-6C5FFCB0257F@rabinergroup.com> <LO2P265MB1247042B1E0F5A2E3E60F9D8F9210@LO2P265MB1247.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <2D648E68-FF06-4F11-BB82-FBB110B61C0B@rabinergroup.com> <CAJ4y7gx_K6KeMQOWgML+06skm5MVu5Esw5ugtrGVP6ujWF=mOw@mail.gmail.com>

Kodachrome had a 400 speed film for a while and it was more grainy than tri 
x in most developer dilution combinations by far.
It even came in 120. Short lived.

 
 

-- 

Mark William Rabiner
Photographer

?On 1/1/20, 2:04 PM, "LUG on behalf of Robert Baron via LUG" 
<lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of lug at 
leica-users.org> wrote:

    Thanks to all who responded.  It appears there are a lot of options for 
me
    to consider and try, although nothing is really and truly pocketable
    yet.....I guess it has something to do with the motors these autofocus
    lenses need.
    
    The LUG has definitely evolved I will say!
    
    Rabs is certainly right about pointillism.  I caught a couple of shots at
    ISO 51,200 and that describes them to a 'p', but on the other hand who
    would have thought it when Kodachrome was ASA 10?
    
    --Bob
    
    ====On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 6:07 AM Mark Rabiner <mark at 
rabinergroup.com>
    wrote:
    
    > Well last January 1 I got a DX cropped D500 camera. Not only is the 
sensor
    > format smaller but the camera is bigger and heavier than my full frame 
D750.
    > So I did the opposite of what I always thought was important. Which 
was if
    > you were shooting a smaller format have the camera be very much 
smaller as
    > well.
    > One thing is the non-anti-aliasing screen which makes for shots of bare
    > leaved trees a level up from what I'm shooting.
    > If it?s a low light deal I'd for sure bring along my D750.
    > But for a while longer I'll still be shooting with the D500.
    > We'll see that the Z50 which people think relates directly to the D500
    > more than numbers wise.. what that does to my work or me.
    >
    > The noise effect you do get when you shoot high iso's with the D500 
I've
    > yet to fully explore. It seems to give Sunday in the Park with George 
a run
    > for its money. Pointillism.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    >
    > Mark William Rabiner
    > Photographer
    >
    >  ?
    
    _______________________________________________
    Leica Users Group.
    See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from kenphoto at cogeco.ca (Ken Photo) ([Leica] Nikon Z50: 3 Dog Photos, 2 Others)
In reply to: Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] Nikon Z50: 3 Dog Photos, 2 Others)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Nikon Z50: 3 Dog Photos, 2 Others)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] Nikon Z50: 3 Dog Photos, 2 Others)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Nikon Z50: 3 Dog Photos, 2 Others)
Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] Nikon Z50: 3 Dog Photos, 2 Others)