Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/12/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hey, you just get a Sony to SL adapter and Bob's your Uncle........ And that nice long Sony 600mm Lens will find a new home on your new SL2...... Frank Filippone, who actually knows that no such adapter exists...... and owns Doug's past Sonys, and wishes Doug would sell off his A7Riii..... Red735i at verizon.net ARGGGHHH! I wish I hadn't read this! Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com -----Original Message----- >From: Ken Iisaka <ken at iisaka.org> >Sent: Dec 9, 2019 4:19 PM >To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >Subject: [Leica] SL2 arrived > >So, I had been on the fence about getting an SL2. I knew I didn't "need" 47 >mp. I also thought the Q2 I acquired a few months ago produced unbelievably >fantastic results when I took it on a trip to Italy a while back, too. > >Yet, I put myself on a waiting list for an SL2, thinking that it won't be >until some time next year until I receive it, and I thought I would have >some time to decide whether I really wanted it or not. > >Well, it turned out that I got an e-mail last week that I would be >receiving one soon. Panicked, I debated whether to cancel the order, but >the lapse of judgment let it slip by, and a box arrived a few days later. > >I have not shot many pictures with it yet but here are a few things: > >The image stabilization works incredibly well, with a native SL lens, as >well as a coded M lens. It even worked well with a non-ROM R lens, after I >set the lens spec through its touch-screen UI which is extremely intuitive, >even better than SL. This means I'll take more hand-held pictures with my >collection of M- and R- mount lenses. Stabilization seems to work even >better than the Q2. > >Mounted on a tripod, it captures far more details than I can see with my >very own eyes. I have recently printed a landscape taken with a Q2 to >16"x24", and immediately ordered the same with 24"x36". Because the Q2 >picture had to be cropped a little bit from the original, I wasn't using >all the information that was captured. With the excellent 24-90, I can >really use every square millimeter of the sensor. The result is comparable >to, dare I say, 4x5. Over the weekend, I took some pictures around the >Fitzgerald Marine Reserve in San Mateo County at dusk, and came home with >stunning images, taken with 30-second exposures. > >With a compact prime lens, I can see it making the Q2 redundant, even if Q2 >is lighter than the SL2 body alone. However, the Q2 is so invisible, where >the SL/SL2 seem so imposing. I will likely keep the Q2 to take snapshots, >but the SL2 will probably be used more often than the SL was. > >With my previous Leica and non-Leica cameras, I was aware of their >limitations, be it an M3, M6, M8, or a Leicaflex SL2 or even the digital >SL. Now, it feels like there are no limits. > >The only other time I felt the same astonishment was when I tried a Leica >M3 for the first time, after years of Japanese SLRs. Or, the time I tried a >Fazioli concert grand after decades of playing Steinways. It just felt like >the universe just got bigger beyond my ken. > >Anyone wants to buy an SL, cheap? > >-- >Ken Iisaka >first name at last name dot org or com > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information