Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/09/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]IMHO, I think that we should stick to the format as it was last time, i.e. photographs taken "in the spirit of" Leica, but with whatever we are using, Leica , Fuji, Sony, Nikon, etc etc. Perhaps, but only if all agree, no phone shots (not they can't be very good, but...). Maybe the title should be "The Spirit of Leica"? If we want to fill in "the gaps" how about a special part of the web site as an exhibit. A book to cover the missing years would take too long and be too large. Peter PS Sorry Gerry, but I disagree. I think (say) Leica glass on a Fuji X should be acceptable. On 22/09/2019 04:58, Dan Khong via LUG wrote: > Friends > > I have been thinking about the 2019 LUG Year Book. As we all know, there > are three missing years between the last Year Book in 2015 and this coming > one. Perhaps one could look at this one as a special revival Year Book. > There can be two possibilities: > > Scenario 1: Have a Year Book that calls for two pictures taken in 2019. > > Scenario 2: Although the aim is to capture photos taken in 2019, I wonder > if this "Revived LUG Year Book" 2019 edition can also accept one photo from > the missing years and the customary images taken in 2019 - but still > limited to the customary maximum of two pictures. This can encourage more > responses without Uncle Ted needing to stretch his vocal cords to get > people jumping out of their seats. > > Just sharing my thoughts about this. Of course Brian will be holding the > mike and have the final say. > > Happy snaps. > > Dan K. > Singapore > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Dr. Peter Dzwig