Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/07/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Even if you accept the somewhat dubious proposition that farmers are needed to keep the countryside pretty, it would be far more efficient for the Swiss population as a whole to just pay them to look after the land and forget about farming, while allowing free imports from the EU. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA > On 6 Jul 2019, at 11:16, Philippe via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote: > > Except if you take into account that tourism would certainlynot be so > appealing without them. Think of the maintenance cost of the slopes for > the winter, and of the trails for the rest of the year for instance. > And it is also some investment for future generations. Better than what > Spain, or France, did when the destroyed the landscapes of their coast for > the sake of skin cancers. > > I must admit that the price to pay shows in the butchers, dressed like, > and charging as much as, jewelers ;-) > > Amities > > Philippe > > > >> Le 6 juil. 2019 ? 06:29, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> a ?crit >> : >> >> A total waste of money > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information