Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/01/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Submitted for Your Approval http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10161122536855591&l=fa701ae6dc I put pix up on Fbook every day for years. Not a Lug approved source but as of late; all I got. My website had tall grass growing in it. Other better for pix looking Social Media may be Tumblr, Pinterest, Twitter, Instagram, Flickr, Goodreads but FB seems to have its claws into me as my realworld friends from various lifetimes are gather there. Not just photobugs. -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer ?On 1/15/19, 9:50 PM, "LUG on behalf of Jayanand Govindaraj via LUG" <lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of lug at leica-users.org> wrote: Rolf, I presume you are talking about the conversation Mark, Philippe and I had. This was in reference to a specific camera, the Nikon D500, which whether you like it or not, is a speed demon, and does help massively in taking action shots. It seems churlish to suggest that technology should not be used to improve one's photography just because the technology was not available in the past. Enough of my photographs are posted on the LUG gallery for you to make up your mind on photographic content, including one message in the same digest. Could we have the benefit of your comments on the artistic merits of these? I, for one, take negative comments in my stride, as a way to improve, so you can go right ahead and pillory them if you do not like them! Could we also have the benefit of looking at your photographs, because I do not remember ever seeing any? Finally, when replying to a digest mail, could I request you to trim the digest so that only the message you are replying to is available, in order to make it clear what you are referring to, as a courtesy to the other members? Cheers Jayanand