Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/12/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I would lose the 16-35 and especially the 90-280. If that does not bring you the weight reduction you need, then also the 90/2. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator> YNWA > On 28 Dec 2018, at 23:31, Tina Manley via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> > wrote: > > LUG: > > I'm packing for my trip to Bangladesh. We are carrying only carry-on > luggage - one suitcase of clothes (for Tom and me for 5 weeks) and one > rolling camera bag of equipment. Part of the trip goes through Beijing and > we travel on China East Airlines from Beijing to Bangkok. Everything on > all of their sites says that any carry-on bag cannot weigh more than 10KG. > Of course, my camera bag weighs much more. > > I'm taking the SL, 16-35, 24-90, 90-280, 50/1.4, and 90/2.0. I stuck in > the M240 and MM with a 24 and 50 mm M lens. Those don't weigh anything. > I've almost decided to leave the 50/1.4 and 90/2.0 at home. Those are the > heavy ones that I am least likely to use. I will miss the low-light and > beautiful depth of field of those two lenses, though. (I will have the M > 50/1.4 for the M240 and MM) > > What do you think? We leave early Sunday morning. > > Tina > > > -- > Tina Manley > www.tinamanley.com > tina-manley.artistwebsites.com > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley > <http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information