Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Q or a Summicron 28mm with SL?
From: mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 16:46:05 -0800
References: <CABXy407+AmvHB7bNf3RZn=Tszi3KvhG+=UGUgijZ-7-4TkSyFg@mail.gmail.com>

Why not Leica r elmarit. Just bought one for $250. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 6, 2018, at 4:39 PM, Ken Iisaka <ken at iisaka.org> wrote:
> 
> So I have a bit of a dilemma.
> 
> Having recently acquired an SL with Summilux 50, I wanted to add a compact
> wide-angle lens, for snapshots and even casual portraits.
> 
> But then, I quickly came to realize that the price of a Q is quite
> comparable to the price of a Summicron-M 28mm.
> 
> It's almost as if I get a free body if I buy a Q.
> 
> I will soon get a 24-90 SL, but there are times I want to carry a compact
> snap shooter. I can continue to use my Olympus Pen F with Pana/Leica 15mm
> for this purpose, but the Leica image quality does have addictive 
> qualities.
> 
> -- 
> Ken Iisaka
> first name at last name dot org or com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from ken at iisaka.com (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] Q or a Summicron 28mm with SL?)
Reply from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] 28mm f1.4 7Artisans M)
In reply to: Message from ken at iisaka.org (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] Q or a Summicron 28mm with SL?)