Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/08/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] So why are Leica R now worth less than their Minolta parents? $109 R-5 from Roberts on eBay just now. R cameras in the field
From: tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley)
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 18:37:49 -0400
References: <78486654-E155-407B-AC94-98874F0A37D9@teleport.com> <16500c0e2c6-c8a-23c7d@webjas-vad235.srv.aolmail.net>

I use all of my R lenses on my SL.  I'm glad I never sold them.

Tina

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> 
wrote:

> Maybe that is the key,,,,, Leica designed zoom lesnes stay high in price,
> primes and designed by others zooms  drop like a rock.
> Stll amazed that a camera system that was discontinued over 10 years ago,
> was a bit esoteric to begin with, and has/had no real digital capability
> has had such high prices all these years......
> If only the SL had a R adapter that would operate the iris of the R
> lenses......
>
> Frank Filippone Red735i at verizon.net
>
> On Thursday, August 2, 2018, Mark Kronquist via LUG <lug at 
> leica-users.org>
> wrote:
>
> Aside from the non sigma Minolta derived zooms then. Primes. Cheap. R
> summilux 80s is 1/10th price of m summilux from same era. Be it 35. 50.
> 80/75 Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 2, 2018, at 8:34 PM, Frank Filippone <
> red735i at verizon.net> wrote: > > Lenses went up recently..... except the
> older ones....they should have tanked.... > > You can buy a perfectly good
> 28-70 for less than $400, but the 35-70 is $1K. Similar in the 80-200 which
> still runs $1K+ and if you want the 21-35, that will set you back almost
> $3K...... > The 75-150, which i bought and tested, costs less than $200 and
> is better by my testing than a Nikon 70-210 F4, which costs $750++ > Who is
> buying all of these to keep the prices so high? Retired Doctors, Lawyers
> and Indian Chiefs? > Could be the after effects of the SL? But the lenes
> are a PITA to use as they are not native mount.... might as well use N or
> C. > > Haven?t seen a R camea in the field for years..... > > > Frank
> Filippone Red735i at verizon.net > > On Thursday, August 2, 2018, Mark
> Kronquist via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> wrote: > > I thought the film
> revival would raise all boats but no? I just scored an R-5 lovely camera
> shot thousands of slides in Tanzania with it, an R-6 still have. And R-E. >
> > Roberts just sold me shipped an R-5 good working order. $109. > > Minolta
> X700s and XE-7s good cameras both seem to close at a hundred bucks as well
> > > Nikon FM and bog standard OM1 s again great cameras. Bring more > >
> Why? > > Still seeking R-3, Leicaflex and R8/9 w DMR > > Cheap lenses too >
> > Thx mark in pdx > > _______________________________________________ >
> Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for
> more information > > _______________________________________________ >
> Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for
> more information _______________________________________________ Leica
> Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley
<http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html>


In reply to: Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] So why are Leica R now worth less than their Minolta parents? $109 R-5 from Roberts on eBay just now. R cameras in the field)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] So why are Leica R now worth less than their Minolta parents? $109 R-5 from Roberts on eBay just now. R cameras in the field)