Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/07/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I appreciate you not liking them, I am not keen myself, but there are 2
overriding reasons to site wind farms off shore, wind consistency and the
ability to deploy machines which are much larger than could be moved into
place on land.In parts of the Pyrenees there are small wind turbines on
every ridge as far as the eye can see but they are the biggest they can get
in place. It is hideous and IMO much worse than I am seeing in your
pictures.Seems a shame to mar the beautiful Scottish coastline a bit but
people demand more and more energy. There are not only more of us people but
the energy use per person in modern life must be many times what it was 60
years ago.When I was a kid it was one bath a week, now it is 2 per day in
some households. Air conditioning didn't exist anywhere in the UK, central
heating was rare etc., etc.cheers,Frank D.
On Monday, 16 July 2018, 11:52, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk>
wrote:
I am enjoying my view while I can....? In the first shot you can see the
bases for wind turbines on the horizon to the left, the second shot (nearly
a 1:1 crop) show the first tower and turbines fitted.? In a year or so there
will be nearly 90 of them (+160m tall) straight out in front of our house
:(? Yes this is NIMBYism, but there are vast tracts of suitable land inland
here where people do not go or see them.....
http://johnmcmaster.com/PAW/2018/28
C & C welcome
john
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information