Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2018/04/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Whoa! Not snide at all. I belong to another group that's currently trying to work this out. The "default" there is not to analyze or criticize, just to praise or keep quiet. They're looking for some way to mark photos for which criticism is requested. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, 1:40 AM Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote: > I assume this is a snide remark. You post, you ask for feedback, some > people will give you what you want, others will not. That is how things > work. > > Of all the mailing lists in which I have participated in the past 20 > years, this one has the highest signal-to-noise ratio. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > *http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>* > *http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu <http://www.greatpix.eu>* > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: *http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws* > <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws> > Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ > Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator > YNWA > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 09 Apr 2018, at 07:37, Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Is there an abbreviation for requesting constructive criticism and > analysis? > > > -Lew Schwartz > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Nathan <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote: > >> Picture Every So Often. >> >> Cheers, >> Nathan >> >> > On 05 March 2018 at 15:35 Lew Schwartz via LUG <lug at leica-users.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Please Evaluate SO I can get some sleep? >> > ^ ^ ^^ >> > >> > -Lew Schwartz >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Leica Users Group. >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > >