[Leica] Leica SL 90-280 Lens

[mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)]

At first thought a 90-280mm sounds like an insanely hyper extended zoom no pro would use but it?s just a 70-300 with the ends snipped with a cigar cutter. 
Serious shooters tend to like 80-200?s not 70-300s. But I?m ok with them. I use them and am getting another one later this year. 
What I am getting is the just out AF-P NIKKOR 70-300mm  f/4.5-5.6E ED VR  $746.95 as I trashed my earlier G version shooting upwards in the rain last year getting some of the best shots in my life.. Just a few foggy elements they refuse to clean it. Had I been shooting with a pro grade 80-200 2.8 it would have been sealed and I?d still have a lens and silk long underwear.
The new out Nikon ?E? lens weights a pound and a half to the Vario-Elmarit-SL? s 4 pounds. It will not make as sharp an image as the $6000 Vario-Elmarit-SL but will have its moments as it?s got stuff like VR Rated 4.5 stops improvement so you can shoot a tree in the dark hand held with an less than a million iso and it?s got stuff no one has like an E Electronic diaphragm and AF-P: ?Stepper autofocus motor? faster and quieter lens  both of which which others don?t have yet. For the price of the Leica lens I can get eight of these. What I need is wool socks. Thinner ones. I can get those too then can stop my lenses form clanging in my bag.

I think where they went wrong with this Leica lens for the SL is making it a f2.8-4 which is the beginning of  making of a monster. Anybody walking around with a current 80-200 2.8 AF?  You?d have  to have arms like Popeye. You can settle for an f 4 or 4.5 when you?re out all day with it Some very mouthwatering and tele zooms that no one is embarrassed about using are not f2.8?s F 4 is the new f2.8.*   But Leica?s main focus now seems to be all about non-affordability.  I you could possibly in a million years afford it what good is it? It?s for people who drive Ferraris; Leica has said goodbye to serious pros long ago. A serious pro could afford the body but not keep up at all with the glass. And it?s all about the glass. And having a second body.


* I could wait for more money and get the AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/4G ED VR  for twice the cost at $1400.
Probably better sealed than the AF-P NIKKOR 70-300mm  f/4.5-5.6E ED VR  
I feel like I should be able to shoot in the rain. And always have.
 
 

-- 

Mark William Rabiner
Photographer

On 
    _______________________________________________
    Leica Users Group.
    See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information