Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] lightroom
From: gerry.walden at icloud.com (Gerry Walden)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 08:33:40 +0100
References: <15f32b2367e-c0d-62e87@webjas-vaa202.srv.aolmail.net> <15f33372b53-c0e-c9dc@webjas-vad111.srv.aolmail.net> <CAH1UNJ0g69Mbh081qpQnCVFP+-8GaQuG7A+2rdYH4uV=avZR4w@mail.gmail.com> <77881C73-7403-43F5-AB31-E8BB68E5348B@gmail.com> <CAH1UNJ0AFYdXn3Y9KT6qXVzndMyZR=gM+yg+DOE8=Cf9kxffrg@mail.gmail.com>

I am very happy with Lightroom CC, and you should not overlook the small but 
useful ?add-ons? that you get such as ?Portfolio? and ?Spark?. It also 
includes all the updates to Photoshop. All in all I think it is an excellent 
package for the money.

Gerry

Gerry Walden
023 8046 3076
0797 287 7932

> On 19 Oct 2017, at 08:29, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Philippe,
> Not necessarily the only reason. The upgrade could also be for real
> advances in processing within the software. By your logic, just shoot JPGs
> - you will not need any software at all!
> 
> Cheers
> Jayanand
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Philippe <photo.philippe.amard at 
> gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> That?s if you upgrade the camera body Jayanand.
>> I could still run the original LR 1.0 if I kept using the cameras I had at
>> the time.
>> 
>> Amities
>> Philippe
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 19 oct. 2017 ? 08:02, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> a
>> ?crit :
>>> 
>>> Adobe's perpetual licenses required upgrades every two years which cost
>> way
>>> more than what I pay over two years with the Cloud Subscription.
>>> 
>>> Ditto for Microsoft Office.
>>> 
>>> Economically, the CC is the way to go!
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Jayanand
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at 
>>> verizon.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The standalone version of LR Will not be supported after Dec 31. No more
>>>> revisions, enhancements, added cameras, etc after that date.
>>>> Adobe is making so much money from the subscription service, the
>>>> additional income from the perpetual versions are no longer worth it.
>> Or so
>>>> it appears.
>>>> They now own us. You either pay your monthly fee or your images are
>>>> basically as you took them. Your enhancements, crops, etc are no longer
>> of
>>>> any use. You would need to do them over again with some other SW.
>>>> If you have not figured it out yet, do not trust any promises from
>> Adobe.
>>>> 
>>>> Frank Filippone
>>>> Red735i at verizon.net
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] lightroom)
In reply to: Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Fwd: lightroom)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Fwd: lightroom)
Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] lightroom)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] lightroom)