Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/09/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think you get a lack of continuity from pic to pic a distraction with the
black corners. That?s the negative side of it.
Is it part of the photo or is it the mount? Lots of people take their
transparencies out of the mounts when they print them in the darkroom.
I used to do a lot of Cibachromes in a rental lab with a lot of other people
and some of them always did this as a matter of course I used to watch them
do it.
I?ve also worked in other situations when all slides were transferred to
glass mounts.
So, mounts are a storage medium and not the picture itself.
The mount takes a few percentage points out of the picture which you saw in
the finder if you had a full frame flagship SLR finder so plenty of people
want want they saw in the finder if they paid extra to get it.
This image by way is looking any color you want as long as its cyan. Needs
red like gangbusters!
--
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
On 9/1/17, 4:07 PM, "LUG on behalf of Tina Manley"
<lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of tmanley
at gmail.com> wrote:
PESO:
The actual title is Trains and Boats and Clotheslines and it's another
one
that would make a good jig saw puzzle.
My question is about the Kodachrome corners. All of my KC slides have
rounded black corners from the old KC cardboard mounts. I usually clone
those corners out but then I wondered why. They are there and maybe part
of the photo.
What do you think?
http://www.pbase.com/image/166121788
Tina
--
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information