Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/07/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] noct .95 ?
From: john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster)
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 17:00:32 +0000
References: <268387B0-20F8-4C31-87B5-A6FC5D279531@mac.com> <CAAsXt4N9BphLjWD7uHt8knUkxNaB+JzNQKZmsbVQaUWFue_MkQ@mail.gmail.com> <MMXP123MB140825DBCD64CC56FA7781FDF9A10@MMXP123MB1408.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <0076F376-3ABF-4165-8E99-7B8ED1EB90EF@cartersxrd.net> <C702440B-B42E-47CA-A472-9A36ADBE6266@mac.com> <E6BBA509-B0A5-44BD-8095-22FF8F6D799B@gmail.com> <ED28F31A-1D4E-4214-96E7-6FA0A5964639@gmail.com> <MMXP123MB1408B1362E1A48EAD8B5600AF9A60@MMXP123MB1408.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <40DE38D0-C683-42A1-AABB-2E34EDCB534A@gmail.com>

Works well with the M series, so if you have the body and lens much cheaper 
than an SL ;-)

john

-----Original Message-----

Not sure how the SL EVF would work with that...

Bob Adler
www.robertadlerphotography.com

> On Jul 19, 2017, at 9:13 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Or an ND1.8 or stronger for those with (slightly) less money ;-)
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Both noctiluxes can now be used in full daylight wide open. With the SL 
> having an electronic shutter speed capable of 1/16,000 sec (apparently ISO 
> dependent) it is no problem...
> There. I just got you thinking about parting with about $12,000 US!
> 
> Best,
> Bob
> 
> Bob Adler
> www.robertadlerphotography.com
> 
>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 3:19 PM, lluisripollphotography 
>> <lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Steve,
>> 
>> I?ve never owned a Nocti because for my style I would rarely use it wide 
>> open, on the other hand is an expensive and quite big lens. However I?ve 
>> tested all the versions of the Nocti, the 1.2, the 1.0 E58 and E60, and 
>> the 0.95. If I could afford one I would be decided for the 1.0, the 0.95 
>> is absolute perfection, I think it can replace any other 50mm you have 
>> (except the APO), the 1.0 is still magical?.. A friend of mine has bought 
>> a minty 0,95 for 6.000 Euro, if you are patient you can find one.
>> 
>> Good luck my friend!
>> 
>> Amiti?s
>> Lluis
>> 
>> 
>>> El 19 jul 2017, a les 0:05, Steve Barbour <stevebarbour at mac.com> va 
>>> escriure:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 2:38 PM, RicCarter <ric at cartersxrd.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> curious about why your preference for the 1 over the .95
>>> 
>>> Yes, me too.
>>> 
>>> and thank you all, for your help.
>>> 
>>> Steve
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ric
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 5:26 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> To be honest, I use my f1.0 far more than the f0.95.... but neither 
>>>>> are for sale ;-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> john
>>>>> 



In reply to: Message from stevebarbour at mac.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from stevebarbour at mac.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (lluisripollphotography) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)