Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2017/07/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] noct .95 ?
From: stevebarbour at mac.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:05:57 -0700
References: <268387B0-20F8-4C31-87B5-A6FC5D279531@mac.com> <CAAsXt4N9BphLjWD7uHt8knUkxNaB+JzNQKZmsbVQaUWFue_MkQ@mail.gmail.com> <MMXP123MB140825DBCD64CC56FA7781FDF9A10@MMXP123MB1408.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <0076F376-3ABF-4165-8E99-7B8ED1EB90EF@cartersxrd.net>
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 2:38 PM, RicCarter <ric at cartersxrd.net> wrote:
>
> curious about why your preference for the 1 over the .95
Yes, me too.
and thank you all, for your help.
Steve
>
> ric
>
>
>
>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 5:26 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> To be honest, I use my f1.0 far more than the f0.95.... but neither are
>> for sale ;-)
>>
>> john
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies:
Reply from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (lluisripollphotography) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
In reply to:
Message from stevebarbour at mac.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.uk (John McMaster) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)
Message from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] noct .95 ?)