[Leica] Film Lab

[billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce)]

I really really really miss my B&W darkroom. The whole experience was 
soothing and healing.

But I will say that my film scanners were better than my flatbed.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Mark Rabiner
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 1:45 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Film Lab

Me too! As much as I loved working in it for decades I love even more not 
working with it now.
As much as I love having great classic or funky cameras in my hands I love 
image making more.
For me it?s about the picture.




-- 

Mark William Rabiner
Photographer

On 6/4/17, 10:15 AM, "LUG on behalf of Tina Manley" 
<lug-bounces+mark=rabinergroup.com at leica-users.org on behalf of 
tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:

    I will never go back to film.  Life is too short.

    Tina

    On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at 
gmail.com>
    wrote:

    > Dan,
    > Oh, I am sure of that!
    >
    > I feel that digital output is still better than darkroom output, 
though,
    > even for B&W. IMHO, there is simply no comparison, in the complete
    > workflow, from capture to print. As I said, others may have different
    > opinions and I respect that - I know Lluis does, and we have discussed 
this
    > many, many times privately, and in the end we just amicably agree to
    > disagree, and go on with what suits us individually! However, I find 
the
    > exchange of views very useful, leading to invaluable insights.
    >
    > Cameras are tools for me, and digital cameras, Fuji & Nikon, one for 
street
    > and one for wildlife, are my tools of choice at this point of time. 
The
    > Fuji GFX50S is tempting, and exerting a siren's song,  but I cannot 
see how
    > I have any use for it that makes it superior to my existing gear, for 
my
    > type of photography, and the sizes I print at present. A printer that
    > accepts 24" wide paper, instead of 17" that my Epson 3885 uses might 
be a
    > better choice right now!
    >
    > I have a fair amount of film camera equipment gathering dust on my 
shelves
    > and in the bank locker, more, I am sure, than most of the most 
committed
    > film shooters around - Leica IIIF and IIIG, Nikon F Apollo. F2AS,
    > F3Titanium, F4, F100, Canon and Nikon Rangefinders, Rollei TLRs, 
Mamiya
    > 645E - except for the Leicas, all of them were originally bought by my
    > family - uncles, aunts, father, myself - and finally found their way 
to me.
    > Most of these are with me because I did not have the wit (or the 
heart) to
    > sell them in time. This after selling most of my Leica film equipment 
in
    > London a few years ago (M3, M2, R6.2 and 10 lenses)!
    >
    > Pens and watches, on the other hand, are hobbies, passions which make 
them
    > an emotional issue, while cameras are just a utilitarian one! I am
    > particularly fond of JLR and IWC in watches, and Pelikan as well as 
the
    > Japanese trio, Namiki/Pilot, Sailor and Platinum as far as pens are
    > concerned, and primarily these are what I use.
    >
    > Cheers
    > Jayanand
    >
    > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Dan Khong <dankhong at gmail.com> 
wrote:
    >
    > > Jayanand
    > >
    > > You might be more analog oriented than you think.
    > >
    > > I actually like collecting and using old fully mechanical watches 
and
    > apart
    > > from the antique look, almost all that I have are accurate and they 
run
    > > like clockwork. I also write with fountain pens in my work and cheap 
ones
    > > perform really well. So it looks that we have much in common.
    > >
    > > Dan K.
    > >
    > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj 
<jayanand at gmail.com
    > >
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > > > I disagree, I think film is nowhere as good as digital, but to 
each his
    > > > own.....:-) (Hey - I use mechanical watches and fountain pens!!!)
    > > >
    > > > Cheers
    > > > Jayanand
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 3:18 AM, lluisripollphotography <
    > > > lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > Gerry, Dan
    > > > >
    > > > > I?m agree of course, but film is not only nostalgia, it is 
better
    > > quality
    > > > > than pixels technologies?
    > > > >
    > > > > Cheers
    > > > > Lluis
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > > El 3 juny 2017, a les 23:23, Dan Khong <dankhong at gmail.com> 
va
    > > > escriure:
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Lluis
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Film and darkroom is far from dead. Ilford is revived as
    > > Harman-Ilford.
    > > > > > Kodak still makes films both for still photography and
    > > cinematographic
    > > > > > industry. Seems Star Wars and latest Bond movie were shot on 
film.
    > > Once
    > > > > in
    > > > > > a while, I set up my darkroom (bedroom for the dry part and
    > > connecting
    > > > > > bathroom for the wet part) and enlarge a dozen prints. Nothing
    > beats
    > > > the
    > > > > > smell of fixer for nostalgia.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Bests
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Dan K.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 6:34 PM, lluisripollphotography <
    > > > > > lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > >> Jayanand,
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >> The best B&W is from the darkroom, now I?ve been back I 
regret to
    > > have
    > > > > >> spent so much time and money on digital?.
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >> Cheers
    > > > > >> Lluis
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >>> El 16 maig 2017, a les 5:05, Jayanand Govindaraj <
    > > jayanand at gmail.com
    > > > >
    > > > > >> va escriure:
    > > > > >>>
    > > > > >>> If it catches anybody's fancy!
    > > > > >>>
    > > > > >>> https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/175814937/filmlab-an-
    > > > > >> app-for-viewing-and-digitizing-analog-f
    > > > > >>>
    > > > > >>> Cheers
    > > > > >>> Jayanand
    > > > > >>>
    > > > > >>> _______________________________________________
    > > > > >>> Leica Users Group.
    > > > > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
    > > information
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >>
    > > > > >> _______________________________________________
    > > > > >> Leica Users Group.
    > > > > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
    > > information
    > > > > >
    > > > > > _______________________________________________
    > > > > > Leica Users Group.
    > > > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
    > information
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > _______________________________________________
    > > > > Leica Users Group.
    > > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more 
information
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > > _______________________________________________
    > > > Leica Users Group.
    > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more 
information
    > > >
    > >
    > > _______________________________________________
    > > Leica Users Group.
    > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
    > >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Leica Users Group.
    > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
    >



    -- 
    Tina Manley
    www.tinamanley.com
    tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
    
http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html

    _______________________________________________
    Leica Users Group.
    See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information