Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/05/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Desire the zooms for travel... Bob Adler www.robertadlerphotography.com > On May 5, 2017, at 9:15 PM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> > wrote: > > I don't have the SL, nor even the M240, but is "image quality, vs the M240, > significantly improved with M lenses" to be your primary objective? If so, > I can't imagine how the SL would be significantly better than the M240 with > M lens. > >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello all. >> >> I'm contemplating selling some gear (M240, M21mm/1,4 ASPH, Sony A7r II >> modified by Kolarivision for Leica WA lenses) plus some cash for an SL and >> the 24-90. >> >> Two questions: >> 1. Given a large collection of recent generation M lenses, are there any >> known issues? MINOR degradation at the corners of images made with WA >> lenses used wide open are not a big deal to me. >> >> 2. Is there a noticeable positive difference in raw files? What >> differences (positive or negative). >> >> Bottom line, is the image quality, vs the M240, significantly improved >> with M lenses to warrant this move? Not really talking about the >> differences in how one works with the two systems. >> >> Thanks in advance for your input, >> Bob >> >> >> Bob Adler >> www.robertadlerphotography.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > -- > "Some People Drive, We Are Driven" > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > richardmanphoto on Facebook and Instagram > <https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information