Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/01/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Tina. Makes good common sense as always! Cheers to a great trip for you and Tom. Best, Bob Bob Adler Robert Adler Photography www.robertadlerphotography.com > On Jan 18, 2017, at 1:49 PM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, I am happier with the SL. The autofocus makes a huge difference in my > ability to get the photos I want. It is a big camera with huge lenses but > it's worth it. I'm packing now for my trip to Siberia. The SL and my > Monochrome are packed in my roll-on camera bag. I'm carrying the M240 in > my Domke messenger bag. The SL will barely fit in there and is too big to > get out easily. I plan to unpack it when I get to China and carry it (with > a new scarf strap) for the whole trip. The 24-90 will cover any photos I > might want to take in good light and the 50/1.4 will be for low light, > although the high ISOs of the SL are so good I'll probably be able to use > the 24-90 most of the time unless I want the bokeh of the 50/1.4. For the > Monochrome and the 240, I have the 50/1.4, the 24/2.8, and the 35/2.0 - all > for different purposes. That's all. I've greatly reduced the number of > lenses I'm carrying. > > So, in short - YES!! > > Tina > > -- > Tina Manley > www.tinamanley.com > tina-manley.artistwebsites.com > http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information