Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Problem with the M9
From: photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:03:48 +0100
References: <D4937132.68CBF%mark@rabinergroup.com>

46 years after I developed my first BW film, I totally concur. 

Post processing is a taste enhancer without which I at least, would end up 
with so much less sapid photographs.

And I?m happy like a painter or a cook to have such a palette and variety of 
tools available.

Amities
Philippe




> Le 5 janv. 2017 ? 09:42, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> a ?crit :
> 
> Well Ted! I think it works like you go in the darkroom and you try to make
> the thing look like it looked and it comes out in the end not quite what 
> you
> expected but you like it better anyway. We do the best we can.
> I don't know about you but some of my better pictures come from tricky
> negatives which were not so easy to print. You're coming out with something
> you don't quite expect.  But it all works at great in the end. Pretty soon 
> I
> forget what the thing was really supposed to look like. Or what plan A was.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Don McCullin knighted)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Problem with the M9)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Problem with the M9)