Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/01/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] URL: Who says photography is egalitarian?
From: hlritter at twc.com (Howard L Ritter Jr)
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:32:55 -0500
References: <17e902cec1664d65bc631578b0770f60@WhizzEXM01.whizz.org> <D6EC3C7B6E824C3B8255265F26F74F26@Family>
 
?Nominative determinism?? Do you read New Scientist too, Douglas, or has 
this term come into general use since the magazine introduced it 20 years 
ago?

?howard


> On Jan 3, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Douglas Barry <imra at iol.ie> wrote:
> 
> "John McMaster" <john at mcmaster.fr> posted
>>> 
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38494382
>> 
> 
> Well, you could say that there's indeed a bit of nominative determinism in 
> the name Royal Photographic Society...
> 
> Douglas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] URL: Who says photography is egalitarian?)
 In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] URL: Who says photography is egalitarian?)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] URL: Who says photography is egalitarian?)