Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/12/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What would you conclude?
From: photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe)
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 20:02:24 +0100
References: <634602.9848.1481135444420@elwamui-ovcar.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

That Wetzlar should have been the way to go

Sorry to read this and view that Doug

Hope you can soon find a solution and post more of your wonderful photos

Amities
Philippe

Le 7 d?c. 2016 ? 19:30, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> a ?crit :

> Suppose that 8 months ago you'd sent your most-used lens to Leica for 
> repair (it was dropped, the front rim has a dent and there are tight spots 
> in to focussing ring)
> 
> Suppose further that the lens returned yesterday, unprepared due to a lack 
> of parts.
> 
> And then suppose you opened the package to find this:
> 
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/temp/_DSC4766.jpg
> 
> Aside from having sent the lens to bumbling idiots, what would you 
> conclude?
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> http://doug-herr.fineartamerica.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] What would you conclude?)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] What would you conclude?)