Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/11/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Drive question.
From: spencer at aotera.org (Spencer Cheng)
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:01:20 -0500
References: <0C96E407-CCF5-46AB-89C0-743F4E021DFE@gmail.com>

If you are planning to use something like a RAID-5 configuration, use 
smaller drives (1TB?). Enterprise NAS/SAN servers are still using very small 
HDDs by modern standards for reliability reasons.

All drives will fail sooner or later at the most inconvenient time. Mine 
usually fails when I am travelling.

Recording densities are so high now that transfer rates varies very little 
between different rotational speed. It?s latency which really counts. 10K 
and 15K HDD has lower latency but traded off against noise, power and 
reliability.

In general, server grade HDDs are more reliable. Consumer grade HDDs are 
less. In general?

If you want fast, go for a rack full of SSDs. :) 

Regards,
Spencer

> On Nov 13, 2016, at 13:27, Leo Wesson <leowesson at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Any opinions out there as to a good drive for a NAS enclosure?
> 
> Leo Wesson
> leowesson.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] Drive question.)