Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/09/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Come on, most V lens were designed in 60s-80s with different requirements. You don't put V lens on MFDB for the sharpest photos, may be for the "look". The Fuji-made H lens supposed to be pretty darn good too. May be not S lens good (not sure), but certainly can put up a fight. It remains to be seen what the new XCD (from Nitoh) and the new Fuji GFX lens can do, comparing to the S lens, but I am sure they will be competitive. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:10 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: > I am afraid to say that Hasselblad V lenses show their limitations on an > S, native lenses are far better.... > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > A really nice nteresting visual comparison shows the 2 cameras to be quite > similar in styling, when viewed head-on. > > Placement of user buttons is almost identical. More interesting is that > the SL is actually larger than the GFX, but has the smaller sensor. > > If I were in the MF market, the Leica S family might be higher on my short > list. Hard to beat Leica glass.... > > Hassy V glass is pretty good too! (And I own it....) > > Frank Filippone Red735i at verizon.net > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- "Some People Drive, We Are Driven" // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> richardmanphoto on Facebook and Instagram <https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto>