Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/08/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Ethics in photography
From: leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:59:11 -0500
References: <4a3a3531-2a67-cd64-2708-b0caf08757e9@cox.net>

I had a client send me a check for $9,999.00 that was supposed to be for
$999.00.  It took quite awhile to find someone who would take the check
back and write me one for the correct amount; no one wanted to deal with
it.   Sure was tempted to cash the original!

Leo Wesson
leowesson.com

On Aug 14, 2016, at 19:42, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:

Here is today's question.  I am out of photo mailers, so I go to Staples to
get some more.  I don't use them that often, so bought a pack of 11x14 for
$7.99.  At checkout, the cashier says that will be 54 cents.  I say, that
can't be right unless there is some really extreme sale.  The cashier says
it is, that is how it scans.  Now the price is preposterous on its face,
since I'm sure there is nothing in the store that sells for 54 cents.  So,
the question is, should I have brought it to a manager's attention instead
of buying out the remaining store stock?

Ken


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Ethics in photography)